Skip to content

Sample reports

Five fictional reports, one for each investigation we sell. Read them to judge the depth, the evidence and how confidence is stated before you talk to anyone.

One sample per product

  • Person Intelligence

    Elsabeth VarrowFictional

    Identity resolution, career history, directorships and adverse media on a proposed board appointee.

    Starting at $1,4904 findings, 6 evidence items

  • Company Due Diligence

    Talmorrow Freight Systems LtdFictional

    Legal entity, officers, ownership to the ultimate owner, sanctions, litigation and reputation.

    Starting at $2,4905 findings, 6 evidence items

  • Publicly discoverable assets, corporate interests and financial relationships for counsel enforcing a judgment.

    From $4,9005 findings, 6 evidence items

  • Cyber Investigation

    brindlecove-health.exampleFictional

    External exposure, infrastructure, mail posture, reported credential exposure and lookalike domains.

    Starting at $2,9904 findings, 5 evidence items

  • Complex Investigation

    Daria VellacourtFictional

    One person to a payment trail through two companies, a domain, old infrastructure, an exposed account and a wallet.

    From $9,9004 findings, 9 evidence items

From one person to a payment trail

The complex sample follows a procurement manager through two companies, a shared director, a domain, old hosting, an exposed account, a forum profile and a wallet to the company named as payee. Registry links are facts; the infrastructure and account links are assessments and hypotheses, and the report says so.

Investigation graph of the fictional complex samplePerson: Daria Vellacourt, then Company A: Orrin Tallow Trading Ltd, then Director: Marek Ostrel, then Company B: Quorvane Logistics Ltd, then Domain: quorvane-logistics.example, then Historical infrastructure: Hosting address, 2023, then Breach indicator: Exposed staff account, then Related account: Forum profile, then Wallet: Wallet bc1q...example, then Related legal entity: Brask Meridian Ltd. The numbered list below gives each link, its confidence and evidence.123456789PersonDaria VellacourtCompany AOrrin Tallow Trading LtdDirectorMarek OstrelCompany BQuorvane Logistics LtdDomainquorvane-logistics.exampleHistorical infrastructureHosting address, 2023Breach indicatorExposed staff accountRelated accountForum profileWalletWallet bc1q...exampleRelated legal entityBrask Meridian Ltd
Fact Assessment HypothesisFictional entities. Numbers match the list below.
  1. Link 1: Daria Vellacourt holds 50% Orrin Tallow Trading Ltd (Company A)

    FactConfidence: ConfirmedEvidence: E-X-0001

  2. Link 2: Orrin Tallow Trading Ltd director of Marek Ostrel (Director)

    FactConfidence: ConfirmedEvidence: E-X-0002

  3. Link 3: Marek Ostrel also director of Quorvane Logistics Ltd (Company B)

    FactConfidence: HighEvidence: E-X-0003

  4. Link 4: Quorvane Logistics Ltd operates quorvane-logistics.example (Domain)

    FactConfidence: HighEvidence: E-X-0004

  5. Link 5: quorvane-logistics.example shared host with company a's domain Hosting address, 2023 (Historical infrastructure)

    AssessmentConfidence: MediumEvidence: E-X-0005

  6. Link 6: Hosting address, 2023 account on the domain reported in a breach Exposed staff account (Breach indicator)

    AssessmentConfidence: MediumEvidence: E-X-0006

  7. Link 7: Exposed staff account reuses the account's mail prefix Forum profile (Related account)

    HypothesisConfidence: LowEvidence: E-X-0007

  8. Link 8: Forum profile publishes Wallet bc1q...example (Wallet)

    FactConfidence: MediumEvidence: E-X-0007, E-X-0008

  9. Link 9: Wallet bc1q...example named as payee by Brask Meridian Ltd (Related legal entity)

    AssessmentConfidence: MediumEvidence: E-X-0009

Read the complex sample

About the samples

What does a sample report show?

The same structure as a delivered report, abridged: the intelligence requirement, scope and exclusions, the executive assessment, findings, chronology, alternative hypotheses, intelligence gaps and the evidence index.

How is each finding supported?

Every finding says whether it is a fact, an assessment or a hypothesis, carries a confidence label, and cites evidence items. Each evidence item has a source class, an Admiralty grade and a retrieval date.

Are these real investigations?

No. Every person, company, domain, account and wallet in the five samples is invented, so no real subject is exposed. The grading rules and report structure are the ones the platform uses.

How evidence is graded and confidence is assigned

Published samples on public subjects

Partial reports on listed companies, well-known domains and public figures in their public role. Each was signed off by an analyst and reviewed by a second person before publishing.

None published yet. A public sample goes live only after an analyst signs off the report and a second person reviews it.